Project 2 “Photography as Information” – Exercise 5.3

Brief

Look again at Henri Cartier-Bresson’s photograph Behind the Gare Saint-Lazare in
Part Three. (If you can get to the Victoria & Albert Museum in London you can see
an original print on permanent display in the Photography Gallery.) Is there a single
element in the image that you could say is the pivotal ‘point’ to which the eye returns
again and again? What information does this ‘point’ contain?

Include a short response to Behind the Gare Saint-Lazare in your learning log. You can
be as imaginative as you like. In order to contextualise your discussion you might
want to include one or two of your own shots, and you may wish to refer to Rinko
Kawauchi’s photograph mentioned above or the Theatres series by Hiroshi Sugimoto
discussed in Part Three. Write about 150–300 words.

While going through the materials provided for this part of the course, I have recalled reading a short story “Sundog Trail” by Jack London which interestingly develops the visual incarnation of the concept of a story described by Walter Benjamin in his essay ‘The Storyteller’:

“The value of information does not survive the moment in which it was
new. It lives only at that moment; it has to surrender to it completely
and explain itself to it without losing any time. A story is different. It
does not expend itself. It preserves and concentrates its strength and
is capable of releasing it even after a long time.”
(Benjamin, [1936] 1999, pp.89–90)

The storyteller in Jack London’s short story is a painter. He is trying to explain the idea of a picture to his companion Sitka Charley, an Indian. The storyteller describes Sitka Charley in the following words: “He visualized everything. He saw life in pictures, felt life in pictures, generalized life in pictures; and yet he did not understand pictures when seen through other men’s eyes and expressed by those men with color and line upon canvas.” He further explains to Sitka Charley what are pictures: “You saw something without beginning or end. Nothing happened. Yet it was a bit of life you saw. You remember it afterward. It is like a picture in your memory.

Sitka Charley agrees that pictures – fragments without beginning or end, but having an essential “now” are a part of life: “Yet is it a true thing. I have seen it. It is life… pictures not painted, but seen with the eyes. I have looked at them like through the window at the man writing the letter. I have seen many pieces of life, without beginning, without end, without understanding.

Sitka Charley then tells a story that he witnessed, of a young woman and a man pursuing another man over thousand kilometers of snow-covered tundra in Alaska at great cost and hardships, ultimately overtaking and killing him. He interestingly depicts the story in “picture manner” using the present tense: “Canoe smash and stop right at Dawson. Sitka Charley has come in with two thousand letters on very last water.” “And then we come upon the man with the one eye. He is in the snow by the trail, and his leg is broken.”

The story concludes with the following dialogue:

“You have painted many pictures in the telling,” I said.

“Ay,” he nodded his head. “But they were without beginning and without end.”

“The last picture of all had an end,” I said.

“Ay,” he answered. “But what end?”

“It was a piece of life,” I said.

“Ay,” he answered. “It was a piece of life.”

And this what photography also is. Pieces of life compiling an astonishing mosaic. Each piece leads who know where. And the more experienced we become, the higher is our appreciation of this beauty.

The Henri Cartier-Bresson’s iconic photograph “Behind the Gare Saint-Lazare” is great in its capaciousness as “piece of life”. “Pivotal point to which the eye returns again and again” in my opinion is the silhouette of the leaping man, which is effectively (from compositional point of view) reflected in the water. Judging on the figure of the man we can see that he leapt from couple of meters to the left – a good leap – and is probably going to land directly to the water. As I assume, a man should be in a hurry to dare such a leap. As we now, Gare Saint-Lazare is one of the busiest railway stations in Paris. So it could be that the man was trying to catch the departing train?

Why was he in a hurry? Who knows? Maybe it was the last train on that day. Maybe he was trying to get home to his sick wife? We will probably never now, but this does not prevent us from fascinating this “piece of life”.

cartier-bresson-henri-iza-gare-st-lazare-paris-1932

 

I remember taking a photograph of a simple street scene on one of the ancient squares of the city of Tashkent (Uzbekistan). The man stopped a young woman on the street and started a conversation. I do not speak Uzbek, so I had no idea what they were talking about. They could be neighbors, discussing weather. Or he could be making a compliment to the passing young and attractive woman. Countless possible scenarios, but the viewer of such photographs never knows which one is right. It is just “a piece of life”, beautiful by itself.

Compliment

Project 1 “The Distance between Us” – Exercise 5.2

Brief

Select an image by any photographer of your choice and take a photograph in
response to it. You can respond in any way you like to the whole image or to just a
part of it, but you must make explicit in your notes what it is that you’re responding
to. Is it a stylistic device such as John Davies’ high viewpoint, or Chris Steele Perkins’
juxtapositions? Is it the location, or the subject? Is it an idea, such as the decisive
moment?

Add the original photograph together with your response to your learning log.
Which of the three types of information discussed by Barrett provides the context
in this case? Take your time over writing your response because you’ll submit the
relevant part of your learning log as part of Assignment Five.

When looking through the Robert Frank’s book “The Americans” my attention was drawn to this photograph.

robert-frank-jehovah_s-witness-los-angeles-webJonatan Day in his study “Robert Frank’s The Americans: The Art of Documentary Photography” described this photograph as following: “The next image features another magazine, this time emblazoned “Awake!” It is in the hands of a Jehovah’s Witness – Los Angeles, who is standing in front of the dove-gray stones of just such a building as was depicted in the last photograph. Away from the massed throng of photojournalistic output, of whatever shade, that filled the previous image’s news-stand, we see this less commercial, cheaper publication, carrying this uncertain older man’s faith. The image ascribes little nobility to the Witness, its tilted perspective rendering him somewhat foreshortened. He seems apologetic, even threatened, perhaps. Nonetheless, his cheap and tawdry looking publication is an aspect of his sincerity, and is unlikely to ever make his fortune“.

As I am well familiar with the religious denomination of Jehovah’s Witnesses, I have decided to take a photograph, depicting modern Witnesses during their public service, in response to this historic image.

I have photographed these two witnesses during their public service in front of their meetings hall. In some way I have tried to respond to the Robert Frank’s photograph by means of the subject, photographing the people driven by the same idea, 60 years later, located at the opposite side of the world. In this case it is the internal information that provides the context for this photograph.

DSC_3192

Project 1 “The Distance between Us” – Exercise 5.1

Brief

Use your camera as a measuring device. This doesn’t refer to the distance scale on
the focus ring(!). Rather, find a subject that you have an empathy with and take a
sequence of shots to ‘explore the distance between you’. Add the sequence to your
learning log, indicating which is your ‘select’ – your best shot.

When you review the set to decide upon a ‘select’, don’t evaluate the shots just
according to the idea you had when you took the photographs; instead evaluate
it by what you discover within the frame (you’ve already done this in Exercise 1.4).
In other words, be open to the unexpected. In conversation with the author, the
photographer Alexia Clorinda expressed this idea in the following way:

Look critically at the work you did by including what you didn’t
mean to do. Include the mistake, or your unconscious, or whatever
you want to call it, and analyse it not from the point of view of your
intention, but because it is there.

I have been making several series of shots for this exercise. When reviewing them afterwards, my attention was drawn to the series of shots below. I liked the look of this tree, it was big and high, and stood lonely. But the viewpoint was not successful – I could not get far enough to make a good shot. I took several shots just in  case and moved on.

When reviewing the shots I realized, that I could try stitching the shots together and see, if they would make something worth.

DSC_2141 DSC_2142DSC_2143 DSC_2147 DSC_2146  DSC_2145 DSC_2144

After couple of hours of “tweaking” the photograph I finally got more or less “straight” and decent result. This is indeed an “unintended” and “unexpected” shot. I like the fact that the resulting photograph is of very high resolution and should probably look good as a large print.

DSC_2141-Pano-Edit